A Secret Weapon For difference between executive and non executive directors case laws

A Secret Weapon For difference between executive and non executive directors case laws

Blog Article

77 . Const. P. 3670/2023 (D.B.) Rehan Pervez V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the instant Petition under Article 199 in the Constitution based over the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued to your petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement within the FIR lodged by FIA and in the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.

کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟

These platforms empower individuals to understand their legal rights and obligations, advertising and marketing a more informed and just society.

The convictions and sentences Upheld, as misappropriation was committed in the bank and given that only the appellants were posted within the relevant time .(Criminal Appeal )

Use the PACER Case Locator if you are not guaranteed which specific federal court the case was filed. You may additionally conduct nationwide searches to determine whether or not a party is involved in a very federal case. This database updates at midnight on a daily basis.

The presiding judge emphasised the need to address the evolving techniques utilized by counterfeiters, noting that the amendment’s inclusion of technological features allows to get a more detailed legal response.

(Interview by email, with Ahmad Rafay Alam, a leading environmental lawyer and activist in Pakistan, August 28th, 2015). Furthermore, the ruling placed a notice and comment restriction on government companies in regards to projects that could most likely pose a public risk. This case is also noteworthy, “because click here it laid down the foundations of all potential public interest litigation introduced before courts for environmental protection.” To cite only one example, following this case, the Supreme Court, citing the Zia decision, found while in the Salt Miners Case (decided on 12th July, 1994) that the right to have water free from pollution and contamination is usually a right to life itself.

Any court may perhaps seek to distinguish the present case from that of the binding precedent, to achieve a different summary. The validity of this type of distinction might or might not be accepted on appeal of that judgment into a higher court.

Online access into the case management system with the Court of Appeals of Virginia. Cases may be searched using name or case number.

acquitted the appellants from every one of the charges therefore the same is dismissed being infructuous. (Criminal Revision )

Consequently, it was held that the right to some healthy environment was part on the fundamental right to life and right to dignity, under Article 9 and 14 of your Pakistan Constitution, respectively. The Court ruled that the word “life” covers all facets of human existence, all these kinds of amenities and services that a person is entitled to appreciate with dignity, legally and constitutionally.

one. Judicial Independence: The court emphasised the importance of judicial independence as well as separation of powers.

Persuasive Authority – Prior court rulings that may be consulted in deciding a current case. It might be used to guide the court, but is not really binding precedent.

Pakistan’s legal system is just not without flaws: overhauling is overdue plus the law regarding murder needs significant reconsideration and clarification. To the time being, the minimum that can be achieved is to ensure that the First Investigation Report (FIR) is registered with honesty and after properly ascertaining the facts.